Comments on snippet: 'XHTML 1.0 Strict Framework'

justinscheetz said on 12/Jan/2009

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:48:23 UTC

Needs some more default meta tags, but a nice start for my projects. Thanks!

preasha said on 22/Feb/2009

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 11:20:12 UTC

when you miss the xml-declaration-tag and specify the content-typ as "text/html", save your time and use the html doctype right from the start. Most modern user agents use their sgml-oriented parser by default, when neither a xml-decl-tag together with a content-type like "application/xhtml+xml" exist, nor the file extension is like xhtml. And, FYI: by default Apache sends html files as "text/html". So under those conditions, the intention to make use of the advantage of the xhtml cannot be achieved, due to a fragmentary implementation/configuration.

MaeDStraub said on 30/Aug/2022

Tue, 30 Aug 2022 20:25:43 UTC

XHTML 1.0 Strict Framework code you have shared for us here is good and provide us with details on how we can use it. While using the [https://makeeasylife.com/how-to-use-assignment-writing-services/](https://makeeasylife.com/how-to-use-assignment-writing-services/) I come to the point that it helps us and can make a difference.