<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Comments on snippet: 'Which version of Linux is this?'</title>
    <description>Snipplr comments feed</description>
    <link>https://snipplr.com/</link>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 01:40:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>trey said on 05/Apr/2008</title>
      <link>https://snipplr.com/view/5690/which-version-of-linux-is-this</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Another good one ( for Ubuntu anyway):&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;cat /etc/lsb-release &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 18:47:51 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>https://snipplr.com/view/5690/which-version-of-linux-is-this</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>cczona said on 05/Apr/2008</title>
      <link>https://snipplr.com/view/5690/which-version-of-linux-is-this</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks, trey.  That led me to the revised version, above.  Using the executable is considered more reliable than reading a file like /proc/version or /etc/lsb-release, because the former catches values that have been overridden.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And because lsb-release is a Linux core tool, it should be available on most distros (i.e. not just Ubuntu).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 20:19:12 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>https://snipplr.com/view/5690/which-version-of-linux-is-this</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
