<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Snipplr</title>
    <description>Recent snippets posted on Snipplr.com</description>
    <link>https://snipplr.com/</link>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 13:33:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>(jQuery) jQuery plugin that doesn't work - PandaWood</title>
      <link>https://snipplr.com/view/26939/jquery-plugin-that-doesnt-work</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 23:59:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>https://snipplr.com/view/26939/jquery-plugin-that-doesnt-work</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(jQuery) Can Good jQuery/Javascript not have lots of comments? - PandaWood</title>
      <link>https://snipplr.com/view/26931/can-good-jqueryjavascript-not-have-lots-of-comments</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I can't help thinking that good use of jQuery &amp; Javascript must use extensive comments&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 20:51:52 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>https://snipplr.com/view/26931/can-good-jqueryjavascript-not-have-lots-of-comments</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
