<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Comments on snippet: 'CSS Image Preloader'</title>
<link>http://snipplr.com</link>
<description>Snipplr comments feed'</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 22:43:38 GMT</pubDate>
<item>
<title>diolt said on 7/22/11</title>
<link>http://snipplr.com/view/2122/css-image-preloader/</link>
<description><![CDATA[ That's the wonderful creation, i would really try this. thanks dear :) ]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 02:32:23 GMT</pubDate>
<guid>http://snipplr.com/view/2122/css-image-preloader/</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>aamirrajpoot said on 1/25/11</title>
<link>http://snipplr.com/view/2122/css-image-preloader/</link>
<description><![CDATA[ I agree with sprites, as it will send less requests to server means more fast response.

It has its pros and cons

Pros is like showing slideshow something, and sprite is good for small images ]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 19:59:53 GMT</pubDate>
<guid>http://snipplr.com/view/2122/css-image-preloader/</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>buzzknow said on 9/17/10</title>
<link>http://snipplr.com/view/2122/css-image-preloader/</link>
<description><![CDATA[ i think its better using sprite, rather than load multiple images :) ]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 01:24:46 GMT</pubDate>
<guid>http://snipplr.com/view/2122/css-image-preloader/</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>smoothdzion said on 11/4/09</title>
<link>http://snipplr.com/view/2122/css-image-preloader/</link>
<description><![CDATA[ I've been using image sprite a lot more lately and they seem to help quite a bit but they are usually bigger in size. 

http://css-tricks.com/css-sprites/

This seems like a great way of loading multiple images though.  I agree with using display:none for sure. ]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:12:25 GMT</pubDate>
<guid>http://snipplr.com/view/2122/css-image-preloader/</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>cshaiku said on 6/30/09</title>
<link>http://snipplr.com/view/2122/css-image-preloader/</link>
<description><![CDATA[ The only downside is if you're using the stylesheet on other parts of your website where you do not need those preloaded images.

It is in fact just as easy (and more flexible given what images you require for different parts) to use a div on the page itself and hide that div in a class as such:

.preloader { display: none; } ]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 01:33:24 GMT</pubDate>
<guid>http://snipplr.com/view/2122/css-image-preloader/</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>dsntos said on 2/28/09</title>
<link>http://snipplr.com/view/2122/css-image-preloader/</link>
<description><![CDATA[ Or you could place the images inside a div and hide that div using css. ]]></description>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 02:04:10 GMT</pubDate>
<guid>http://snipplr.com/view/2122/css-image-preloader/</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>wrburgess said on 2/13/09</title>
<link>http://snipplr.com/view/2122/css-image-preloader/</link>
<description><![CDATA[ Are there any minuses to this technique? ]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:33:36 GMT</pubDate>
<guid>http://snipplr.com/view/2122/css-image-preloader/</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>